The Entries (for solutions)

Fight the ONE global governing (as NWO), by legally and commercially DECENTRALIZING the global system!!!

Here we assume 9/11 as inside job and that more than one bullet where fired to kill jfk,
hence the cover up defines the current system,
(such that, if jfk case would be uncovered, then no one could plan and conspire the 9/11 as a tool to govern. )
see also PNAC and our we-observe

You OWN not only YOUR personal property, which is transferable to money, but also (you own) your proportional (and equal) share in the common property being all the resources owned by your state. It is your responsibility and your power. Let's legalize it, such that You must be able to reassign your share, as you are able to do with your money.

As we would keep this simple statement as a starting point true for any one, we would continue with Decentralizing our Human Systems!!!

Centralized Globalization invites Corruptions

  • All laws originate only in states and as such are only Under the states;
  • The centralized globalization is Upper than any state and allows money controlled by few bankers and shareholders, due to their short terms CEOs, to manipulate representative, media and currency of each state, for their own short term gains;
  • The phenomenon of corruption is backed by the centralized globalization (and as such left over upper than, and out of any control in, each state, hence left over upper than any law) while increasing its power, when using the media, the currency and the agencies of the states for, and by, the fear of panic in each state;
  • The main practice in use by individuals for evaluating the differences between themselves is of comparing the amounts of their private properties, which are depended on currencies of each state, as opposed to the amounts of their share in common properties; and
  • Any state is already weaker than the centralized globalization for containing any constitution defending its citizens.

see also the terms- related-to-Property

Why now?

  • Because currently globalization, backed with privatization of any state's resources, takes over, while weakening, the power of the states and/or of the constitutional federal governing, only in which any rule of law can originate;
  • Because the current centralized globalization, wherein few control the many, proved itself as encouraging global corruption (wherein no law, but the power of the fews over the many, rules and acts against any state and/or their resources for the benefit of the few) ; and
  • Because the players, attacking the origin of rule of law (meaning attacking the power of states, except of their short term gains), while being the ring (or elite) of connected few, in coordination shield by their loyalties, attack the many and have the control over the mainstream media, economy and education, still failed in the governing itself, as the controlled system while reflecting in state of denial, still failed in manging the matters considering the known evidences as for
    • who could be responsible for the 9/11 events and
    • how many bullets where fired to kill jfk.

Hence now, as the scale of cases of corruptions in any state increases it proves not only the individuals, but the global system itself, as the one letting the act of such individuals to emerge, as a whole being, and getting be more then ever, rotten, now, as the scale of cases of corruptions, is the time for all of us to act against corruption by decentralizing the globalization itself, that is to gain any system wherein any power of few over many can not be maintained in the hands of the few and/or by being connected to those few.

A Comment on the common mistake of econometricians: It seems that econometricians talking about economic growth do not consider in their quantitative the instability of the system when it originates in the increasing gap between the many being poor and few being rich, as the strength of, with the trust in, the rule of law decreases, if the ruling power would originate in agreement of free knowledgeable participants. We observe instead an increased use of forces, by means of polices, draconic laws and/or occupation by armies, all of which originate in states attacked by corruption cases. These forces are found to be controlled by few corrupting the states. Hence the more such forces are required in correlation to ruling the increasing gap between poor and rich the more the system gets nearer to its collapsing if the system could contain cases of corruption, in regard to the system itself and regardless any quality or qualifying of the people in the system and so, any of so called economic growth when the growth of wealth is only of the few and on the account of the many seems illusion. e.g. for the few versus the many is the G8's concentrations of power and use of force against their opponents, of which some "cherry-picked" are labeled terrorist.

Note: Clearly all current political elements in USA are afraid from impeachment, for the education matters, where only 55% (May 8,2007) are against it, therefor who must be targeted are not political players but the big cooperations running them!!!


not only YOUR personal property, which is transferable to money, but also (you own) your proportional (and equal) share in the common property being all the resources owned by your state. It is your responsibility and your power. Let's legalize it, such that You must be able to reassign your share, as you are able to do with your money. And let's do it NOW, for to fight the big cooperations' control over any state by corrupting only for the benefits of their shareholders. All which we need is a legal frame containing our differences, i.e. the minimum defining the international system to be decentralized, regardless any judgment, which we might forced, but only in our sub-constitutions regulating our common properties in our states.

The correlation and attachment between

  • choosing and creating such sub-constitutions in one hand and
  • in the other hand the able to be beneficial and able to be reassigned ownership, owned separately by each of us, over the proportional share in the common property of the state (of which control is regulated by the sub-constitution),
    • is the only dynamic and a posteriori mean for making us ETHICAL, when we do not have the knowledge of all but still each of us seek for achieving benefits.

And, by the way, in the end of the day, if you think about it, you would have much more property and power in your hands. Is not it a good deal for YOU to start realizing it NOW?


  • There is an intensive research proving that human are more active in reflection upon expressing what they may loose and are more passive in reflection upon expressing what the may earn, that is correlated with fear making as a tool for engineering mind of mass of people. The question here is how long are you going to be passive when reflecting upon what could you gain here?

See also the negative terminology of propty

  • This proposed system is not communistic one since it allows private properties, nor it is capitalistic one, since it allows active sharing in controlling the common properties of us.

We begin here with an agreement we call constitution of its citizens.

Constitution of its citizens - agreement:

  • the control over common prosperities are divided into separated states, in each of which the common properties are owned by the citizens of the state and shall be defined by
    • the sub-constitution/s as for the HOW and the WHEN the control is to be exercised
    • and branches of power as for the WHO and the FOR WHAT the control is to be exercised; and
  • the control of each such state upon its resources is exercised only in 4 branches of power, completely separated, defined according to their functionality and independently being elected,
    • where the branches are:
      • informative,
      • legislative,
      • executive
      • and judicial.
    • where the informative branch is the one responsible for managing all the information considering which decisions are made in each of the 4 branches,
      • where each such decision may be considered as information for other such decisions,
      • where the informative is the one issuing a unique ticket attached with all the information considering which each such decision is made, as the information with the ticket is to be in the public domain, after a defined maximum time (of its classification), if not immediately and
      • where any such decision is authorized as "one based on information" only if its unique ticket is revealed.

(The informative branch is for Applying the Big Brother on itself.)

Common companies compete big cooperations:

For making money ALSO without Adds , with closing and/or OPENING the source of the companies, while decentralizing also our compressional structures, please read IsWith .

Could we attack the big cooperations?

Yes, and we can make it by non political and legal means, here you can see how.

See also the contradiction in which we are leaving, When and How and some terms and conclusion.


This Proposal is for Constitution belonging to the People of the world:
The People are the citizens having the power to decide as they are direct citizens of the international system. The People always are able to decide about both: their private and common, properties, in a legal and international system and without one (new) world order. In short: while the NWO attempts to gain a centralized globalization, this Proposed constitution is a system guaranteeing Decentralizing of the globalization, when acknowledging the irreversibly of the existence of the globalization itself.

You are invited to participate with us in drafting an agreement, between you us and other, for the benefit of the People of the world regarding their life, liberty, property and mutual happiness.

Why this effort is important to you?
Because currently we the people have no control on our common properties, which belong to us, but manipulated by our representatives in each state or federal governing.

Dear friends, please consider this:

You and other visit this site more than once and are interesting in this project,
but this project would come to its final stage without your or other's financial support.

Any amount, even 5$, you can and want to contribute is ok,

The Homes:

See and respond to our Solution in a Nutshell.
And please help
by referring to here,
by adding your content to here,
and/or, if it is easier for you, by simply making a donation .

For keeping this process, 500 eu per month are required, but currently having 0 eu.
Also, currently we have ONLY the home of namzezam. We want your home to be also here!!!

the Home of the user with a short comment
nam-Home namzezam another entry is organizing things. It is too lonely for me here. Me hope YOU would make your home (also) here. c u then.
Any home is one personal view of our common "CONTEXT" binding us all

What are the entries:

This is the entries point to a set of solutions. Here the set is in your hands!!! Normally and for one moment only, you find yourself in front of a license. Then, it may look ugly but necessary for continuing, so you check it by your thumb and approve "it" with clicking OK. You do not care and they seem not to care and everyone is happy, until the next corner: the court or another OK. This means that "something important for someone" is active behind the scene and that you hope to win more and that YET AGAIN "it" would not catch you.

Here we go differently. Instead of asking you before approving only to read "it", we expect you to write "it" and to act according to "it". We let you participate in what is important for us. Our purpose is to replace the eventually pointless blaming with such a CONTEXT, which would allow our alternative activities to shape our living.
The means are:

  • Here, we are creating and correlating with communities around a new legal frame being constitution of its citizens, which is proposed as the common "CONTEXT" between us all; (After accepting that the world in a way "got completely nuts", this "CONTEXT" is a positive statement establishing what we agree to be the form according which we act between ourselves and others, foreseeing that only around this "CONTEXT" we are to be build. This "CONTEXT" is our conclusions, based on evidences as we understood them, so we also provide our view of the evidences. );
  • We establish this "CONTEXT" here and ask you to participate in any way you could imagine (it is a wiki site having its own SYNTAX, so you can change this site and influence any thing in it including the "CONTEXT"); and
  • We develop a technology, which we will deliver ONLY to such communities, which would accept the "CONTEXT" (and if this sounds like a to aggressive approach for you or toward you, please visit our clarification in social-tech-why).
    • Please tell us your opinion about it (you can use the comments at the top-left of any page).

In short: We develop the technology ONLY for social use, which would increase the political power of the people by the use of their economic forces. We would not start to develop applications using the technology until having a community, to which we deliver. Here you can check and participate in making our common context binding us together, so please do, if you find yourself part of it, join in as a member and help us to make the step of building one community to be done as soon as possible, thanks.


rating: 0+x

Ok, it seems that 9/11 is here forever to stay, through having a decent impeachment being made and it seems hard to believe, but it would be made just because so many people try so hard to push it aside as an irrelevant issue.

Why are we so sure about it? Well, because we prepare ourselves for a very long run.

For us this issue is relevant as one example for how bad the rule of laws is manipulated nowadays, happy we are that we have no other choice than to correct it. Our motivation is not simply the revenge for the past, but the learning from the past for the future, in which those who send the terrorists, which made the 9/11 events, would prefer not to do it again.

Unless otherwise stated, the content of this page is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 2.5 License.